Today, on
Human Rights Day, as we mark the
64th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the inter-American human rights system – guardian of the world’s first international human rights agreement – faces an unprecedented threat to its independence and authority.
The
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights – which oversees implementation of the
American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, adopted in April, 1948, eight months prior to the Universal Declaration – is undergoing a state-initiated “reform” process that may lead to controversial changes in the Commission's practices and procedures, without the consent of the Commission.
As IntLawGrrl Alexandra Harrington
posted in February, since it came into existence in 1960, the Inter-American Commission has promoted and protected human rights in the 35 member states of the
Organization of American States. It does so through reporting, country visits, precautionary measures, and the individual complaints mechanism. The
雷霆加速器破解版下载安装|电脑端永久免费加速器下载_最火 ...:2021-3-24 · 雷霆加速器是热门的游戏加速神器,支持王者荣耀、阴阳师等各种不同类型的游戏加速,让玩家能够畅玩所有网络游戏,现在最火软件站提供了雷霆加速器破解版百度云下载地址,完成雷霆加速器破解版下载安装,就可以使用雷霆加速器的功能,雷霆加速器永久免费破解版让用户能够免费体验vip功能 ... and objections in recent years from some states that disagreed with specific decisions – as have
Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru – or accused it of bias – as has
pc端如何上外网.
In June of 2011, the OAS Permanent Council created a
Special Working Group with a mandate to study the Commission’s work and propose any reforms deemed necessary. The Special Working Group’s
proposals, which the OAS Permanent Council
approved this past January, focused on both the Commission’s institutional practices and its substantive mandate.
Among the
most controversial proposed reforms were those that would:
► Restrict the Commission’s discretion in deciding requests for precautionary measures,
► Significantly alter Chapter IV of the Commission’s Annual Report, in which it highlights countries with particularly troublesome human rights practices,
► Reduce the autonomy of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression, and
► Impose additional restrictions on the processing of individual complaints in ways that could favor states at the expense of victims.
Civil society has criticized the proposed reforms, and the reform process itself, as lacking in transparency and input from advocates and victims.
A joint
statement coordinated by CEJIL, the Center for Justice and International Law, and signed by over 90 organizations, called on the OAS and its individual member states to ensure that the process is truly aimed at strengthening the inter-American system and includes the input of advocates and victims. Representatives of nongovernmental organizations, academia, and the judiciary have also
求电脑免费的加速器 to the “
Bogota Declaration,” which echoes this call.
A politically motivated, state-imposed reform of the Commission’s authority and procedures is a unique and pressing cause for concern to all those invested in the protection of human rights in the Americas.
In the
words of the Commission's chair, José de Jesús Orozco: